Monday, December 2, 2013
Impatiently Waiting for the Innovation to Begin: PDF & the Future of 'Reading'
So, why has this boring yet efficient format continued to vex users and clog our collections of ejournals and ebooks? Change is coming, however, PDF continues to meet some rather basic needs that will have to be worked into the design of future academic products. Academics like having page numbers, having a peer-review piece set in 'stone' of some type so that changes cannot be slipped in - think of all of the hacking of Wikipedia, for example.
Against the Grain recently asked me to figure out when we might see the demise of the PDF for a news piece and the resulting article is available here.
The answer would appear to be don't hold your breath, we have a long way to go finding ways to incorporate innovation, multimedia, interactivity and others wonderful options with a need for stability, integrity and archival access. Will the PDF ever completely go away? I doubt it, we will always have some around to support in legacy systems.
However....innovation is coming, it may just take awhile to really take hold in the research sector. Check out the article and let me know what you think!
The Challenge of Accessibility & New Media
I was asked to write about new media and accessibility for Against the Grain's news blog and you might find the article interesting - especially the perspectives from some very smart people I was able to talk with in doing the research.
Did you realize, for example, that we currently live with a "book famine that causes over 300 million visually impaired persons, the majority of them in developing countries, to be excluded from access to over 90 percent of published works" according to the U.N.? We face a major literacy challenge, let alone a starving marketplace, awaiting innovation and change.
Let's hope for a better world coming with access to all.
Cengage Learning Using Bankruptcy to Restructure for Future Growth
I was asked to write about this action in a news blog for Against the Grain's website and was able to talk with some very interesting, smart people about Cengage's position. Indiana University Kelley School of Business professor Alan Dennis, who has worked with Cengage in the past and has now set up his own etextbook company notes that "unlike other publishers, Cengage was very slow to consider and adopt new ideas in the etextbook space. They told me that Cengage's strategy was to price their books at a 20% premium over other publishers offering similar content, because they believed their books were better and commanded higher prices."
The textbook industry is finding itself in the same difficult position as other book publishers and print-based information industries. Course reserve packs and other innovations have cut into the profits for textbooks for years, and etextbooks and Open Access products (along with MOOCs for training/practice exercises have cut into the market even further.
What is the future of textbooks? Being in the middle of this maelstrom, we can only watch, wait and see.
Google Gives MOOC Development a Major Push
So far, MOOCs seem less than perfect and only mildly popular. However, they do push institutions into moving more content to the web and moving away from both traditional classroom teachings modalities and the use of expensive textbooks - which is a move in the right direction.
Mark Yudof, former President of the University of Minnesota, Texas and California university systems, has frequently spoken of the fact that physical universities have reached the end of growth and that online resources, libraries and classrooms are the only way to expand their bases and increase revenues. Is this the future? I'm not convinced....unless we are moving into some type of retro Dark Age instead of a bright New World.
Your thoughts?
What's Next for the Bezos-Owned Washington Post
"The paper's duty will remain to its readers and not to the private interests of its owners. We will continue to follow the truth wherever it leads, and we'll work hard not to make mistakes. When we do, we will own up to them quickly and completely. I won't be leading the Washington Post day-to-day. ... There will, of course, be change at the Post over the coming years. That's essential and would have happened with or without new ownership. The Internet is transforming almost every element of the news business: shortening news cycles, eroding long-reliable revenue sources, and enabling new kinds of competition, some of which bear little or no news-gathering costs. There is no map, and charting a path ahead will not be easy. We will need to invent, which means we will need to experiment. Our touchstone will be readers, understanding what they care about--government, local leaders, restaurant openings, scout troops, businesses, charities, governors, sports--and working backwards from there. I'm excited and optimistic about the opportunity for invention."
So far, there seems to be no cause for concern. And, given the deep hole that most papers find themselves in today, it will be interesting to see if Bezos can find a way to leverage 21st technologies to save these institutions.
The article I wrote for Information Today's NewsBreaks is available here if you want to check out my reporting on the sale.
Can we really live without our daily paper? I guess many do. How might you work to save the venerable daily paper?
PRISM and the First Amendment: A Critical Issue
I was asked to write about the PRISM program of our government last Summer when information on it was first released for Information Today's NewsBreaks and you can read my findings here.
Since then, things haven't really changed, although it's very interesting - as a lifelong information professional - to see how the government is creating their own metric connections and relationships in tracking 'security' issues.
Timothy Lee wrote a good summary of what we know from government testimony and leaks in a good Washington Post article that you might want to check out as well. London's The Guardian is also doing a good job of pulling together key information on the program.
Maybe its time to pull out a copy of 1984 for a good read!
Altmetrics: NISO Project Brings Scientific Evaluation Into the 21st Century With Altmetrics
The Altmetrics.org site explains the dilemma this way:
No one can read everything. We rely on filters to make sense of the scholarly literature, but the narrow, traditional filters are being swamped. However, the growth of new, online scholarly tools allows us to make new filters; these altmetrics reflect the broad, rapid impact of scholarship in this burgeoning ecosystem. We call for more tools and research based on altmetrics.
As the Altmetrics.org group notes: "Altmetrics are in their early stages; many questions are unanswered. But given the crisis facing existing filters and the rapid evolution of scholarly communication, the speed, richness, and breadth of altmetrics make them worth investing in."
Hopefully we will soon start to see some of the results of the NISO effort.
Stay tuned! And, feel free to share your thoughts here!
© Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. Equal opportunity educator and employer.